I'm just wondering if we follow Mandriva's release cycle model. Every
6th months a release or one year and one release. I think we should
make one release in one year. By doing so devs and translators won't
be in rush in every 6 months. Also there are major changes like
systemd/upstart; those system related things will be more mature in a
year to use. It makes the distro more stable and decraese mirrors
space waste.
One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva's release naming scheme? I.e. do
we call our first release 2011.x ? I don't like this naming scheme and
suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using
code names.
What's your opinion?
Hi all.
At this time, there is a survey asking to the blogdrake's community
what kind of release cycle they prefer. This survey will be active
until the weekend and I think this could be an acceptable look about
community preferences.
We must keep on mind we're creating a user-oriented distro, so we must
be stay in touch about their preferences.
Cheers