Hi,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 08:19, Tux99 <tux99-mga@uridium.org> wrote:
I did a quick comparison of the most common forum software packages
(both commercial and FOSS) from a vulnerability point of view.
I'm subscribed to the well known (every sysadmin that takes his/her job
seriously is subscribed to it) weekly SANS "@RISK: The Consensus
Security Alert" newsletter since 2000, so I have an mbox archive file
that contains almost 11 years worth of weekly alerts of software
vulnerabilities.
A quick an easy way that I have used before to assess the vulnerability
of any software is to do a simple grep of the software name in this mbox
file and count the times that software gets mentioned. While this is not
100% scientific it gives a good approximation of the amount of
vulnerabilities a particular software has suffered from.
Indeed. It's interesting. But ranking only by the disclosed number of
vulnerabilities in the past does not assess what will be in the
future. It's not enough.
What would be an additional important figure is, how long has it been
for each vulnerability to be fixed; how many users each has had, etc.
Plus, what type of vulnerability. Plus, for what branch of the
software (I guess, for instance, phpBB 2.x and 3.x are a bit
different).
Hi,
What we do need is a forum that matches our needs; actually pretty
basic, but maybe for having good admin features, excellent
hackability, extensability, being well documented, having a nice
community of developers around it. And, provided we're in the free
software thing, we want to be able to share changes as well (would it
be only through our own community) without worrying.
So, requirement #1: open source license (as in http://opensource.org/ ).
[...]
Romain
when it comes to forum engine choice there are many things important to
consider (in particular if we are optimistic enough to consider it
could grow with Mageia future success).