<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Pyro update
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Pyro%20update&In-Reply-To=%3C4FC4C8F8.2050002%40gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="015924.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="015926.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Pyro update</H1>
<B>Guillaume Rousse</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Pyro%20update&In-Reply-To=%3C4FC4C8F8.2050002%40gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Pyro update">guillomovitch at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Tue May 29 15:02:48 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="015924.html">[Mageia-dev] Pyro update
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="015926.html">[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release task-obsolete-3-1.mga3
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#15925">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#15925">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#15925">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#15925">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le 29/05/2012 14:56, Oliver Burger a écrit :
><i> Hi there,
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I notice we have pyro 3.10 in the repositories. By now, according to the
</I>><i> projects homepage at <A HREF="http://packages.python.org/Pyro4/intro.html">http://packages.python.org/Pyro4/intro.html</A> pyro
</I>><i> 4.x (which is a reimplementation) can be considered as the main branch
</I>><i> of the project.
</I>><i> So what to do? Both versions of pyro are not api compatible, so just
</I>><i> updating pyro 3.x to pyro 4.x might crush someone's applications.
</I>That's true for all other similar librairies...
><i> So should we import pyro 4.x as a versioned package and keep pyro 3.x as
</I>><i> it is or should we rename pyro 3.x to pyro3 and import pyro 4.x as pyro?
</I>><i> I would prefer the first way, since upstream choose to call the newer
</I>><i> version pyro4 instead of pyro.
</I>Without any explicit need for additional complexity, the simpler the better.
--
The Cavalry doesn't always come to the rescue
-- Murphy's Military Laws n°76
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="015924.html">[Mageia-dev] Pyro update
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="015926.html">[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release task-obsolete-3-1.mga3
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#15925">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#15925">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#15925">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#15925">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>