<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] mass rebuild for Mga 2 ?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20mass%20rebuild%20for%20Mga%202%20%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2BCX%2BbhKMuWQxsVUoB6k0MiaMZr1g42hpiZRO%3D4-FPyjJTYDjA%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="013496.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="013503.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] mass rebuild for Mga 2 ?</H1>
<B>Pascal Terjan</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20mass%20rebuild%20for%20Mga%202%20%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2BCX%2BbhKMuWQxsVUoB6k0MiaMZr1g42hpiZRO%3D4-FPyjJTYDjA%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] mass rebuild for Mga 2 ?">pterjan at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Sun Mar 25 18:15:40 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="013496.html">[Mageia-dev] mass rebuild for Mga 2 ?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="013503.html">[Mageia-dev] mass rebuild for Mga 2 ?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#13497">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#13497">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#13497">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#13497">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 17:07, Kamil Rytarowski <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">n54 at gmx.com</A>> wrote:
><i> **
</I>><i> On 25.03.2012 17:20, Pascal Terjan wrote:
</I>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 15:51, Angelo Naselli <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">anaselli at linux.it</A>> wrote:
</I>><i>
</I>>><i> In data domenica 25 marzo 2012 14:48:01, Julien ha scritto:
</I>>><i> > Hello,
</I>>><i> >
</I>>><i> > Is there a mass rebuild planned before mageia 2 ? And if not, is there a
</I>>><i> > value in rebuilding a package without update since 1 year ?
</I>>><i> Can you point us the list? Maybe we can consider if they can go, or have
</I>>><i> to be
</I>>><i> rebuild, or removed...
</I>>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> That's one third of the packages
</I>><i>
</I>><i> [<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">schedbot at valstar</A> ~]$ ls
</I>><i> /distrib/mirror/distrib/cauldron/SRPMS/core/release/*.mga1.src.rpm | wc -l
</I>><i> 3420
</I>><i> [<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">schedbot at valstar</A> ~]$ ls
</I>><i> /distrib/mirror/distrib/cauldron/SRPMS/core/release/*.mga2.src.rpm | wc -l
</I>><i> 6479
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I have got a semi-automated script to do it.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> On 05.12.2011 15:26, Thomas Backlund wrote:
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Hi,
</I>><i>
</I>><i> so... the long wait is over....
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I've submitted gcc-4.6.2-1.mga2 to core/release now.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> As soon as it's available on the primary mirror I'll invalidate the
</I>><i> cauldron chroots on the BS to make sure the new gcc is used.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Ater that I'll submit a new glibc and kernel so they are built with
</I>><i> the new toolchain.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> So, we now have glibc & the toolchain upgraded:
</I>><i> - glibc is at 2.14.1 (available in cauldron since 2011-10-24)
</I>><i> - binutils 2.22 (available in cauldron since 2011-11-28)
</I>><i> - gcc-4.6.2 (available later today (2011-12-05)
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Now, in order to provide a very good Mageia 2, every package should
</I>><i> be rebuilt with the new toolchain/glibc in order to make sure they
</I>><i> still build _and_ work correctly (and flush out any bugs in the
</I>><i> toolchain)
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Now this rebuild should be done preferably in BR order when possible,
</I>><i> to rule out bad interaction between packages and be preferably be
</I>><i> fully done by alpha3 or beta1 at the latest so we have time to fix
</I>><i> it properly for Mageia 2.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> --
</I>><i> Thomas
</I>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> So we should focus not on the mga1 packages but not [re]bulded since
</I>><i> pushing the 4.6.2.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> On 06.12.2011 00:13, Thomas Backlund wrote:
</I>><i>
</I>><i> 05.12.2011 16:26, Thomas Backlund skrev:
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Hi,
</I>><i>
</I>><i> so... the long wait is over....
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I've submitted gcc-4.6.2-1.mga2 to core/release now.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> As soon as it's available on the primary mirror I'll invalidate the
</I>><i> cauldron chroots on the BS to make sure the new gcc is used.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Ater that I'll submit a new glibc and kernel so they are built with
</I>><i> the new toolchain.
</I>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> New gcc-4.6.2-1.mga2, glibc-2.14.1-3.mga2, kernel-3.1.4-2.mga2 are now on
</I>><i> the mirrors.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> --
</I>><i> Thomas
</I>><i>
</I>><i> So 6th December is the day when new toolchain landed on the mirrors and
</I>><i> all older packages should be rebuilt.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I will prepare a tracker to monitor it according to the package
</I>><i> maintainership. :)
</I>><i>
</I>
Rebuilding half of the distribution now seems the best way to add bugs
before the release...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20120325/e20a8411/attachment-0001.html>
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="013496.html">[Mageia-dev] mass rebuild for Mga 2 ?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="013503.html">[Mageia-dev] mass rebuild for Mga 2 ?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#13497">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#13497">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#13497">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#13497">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>