<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [3550] Kill unionfs support
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5Bsoft-commits%5D%20%5B3550%5D%20Kill%20unionfs%20support&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2BCX%2Bbhr8Q_GR9qgTCxQhHW3agnQgfb1g%3DRw2dwsM4k4d_OwwQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="013198.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="013200.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [3550] Kill unionfs support</H1>
<B>Pascal Terjan</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5Bsoft-commits%5D%20%5B3550%5D%20Kill%20unionfs%20support&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2BCX%2Bbhr8Q_GR9qgTCxQhHW3agnQgfb1g%3DRw2dwsM4k4d_OwwQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [3550] Kill unionfs support">pterjan at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Sun Mar 18 10:51:14 CET 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="013198.html">[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [3550] Kill unionfs support
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="013200.html">[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [3550] Kill unionfs support
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#13199">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#13199">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#13199">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#13199">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 09:24, Thierry Vignaud
<<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">thierry.vignaud at gmail.com</A>> wrote:
><i> On 18 March 2012 00:42,  <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">root at mageia.org</A>> wrote:
</I>>><i> Revision 3550 Author pterjan Date 2012-03-18 00:42:31 +0100 (Sun, 18 Mar
</I>>><i> 2012)
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> Log Message
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> Kill unionfs support
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Why?
</I>><i> It was a nice speedup when used.
</I>><i> It was disabled only b/c of a kernel oops long ago
</I>><i> which should be OK now
</I>
Well unionfs seemed to get different oops in each new version. Anyway
I don't think it should be done like this (having specific code for
unionfs everywhere).
I want to improve current chroot mode (like using a cgroup to easily
kill all processes or set limits) and have a common api to allow other
modes, like building in kvm for example, or using lvm/btrfs rw
snapshots (which should be better supported than unionfs).
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="013198.html">[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [3550] Kill unionfs support
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="013200.html">[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [3550] Kill unionfs support
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#13199">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#13199">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#13199">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#13199">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>