<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Freeze Push Question: pulseaudio
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Freeze%20Push%20Question%3A%20pulseaudio&In-Reply-To=%3C4F5E872B.40603%40colin.guthr.ie%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="013011.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="013024.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Freeze Push Question: pulseaudio</H1>
<B>Colin Guthrie</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Freeze%20Push%20Question%3A%20pulseaudio&In-Reply-To=%3C4F5E872B.40603%40colin.guthr.ie%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Freeze Push Question: pulseaudio">mageia at colin.guthr.ie
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Mar 13 00:30:51 CET 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="013011.html">[Mageia-dev] Freeze Push Question: pulseaudio
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="013024.html">[Mageia-dev] Freeze Push Question: pulseaudio
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#13018">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#13018">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#13018">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#13018">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Hi,
'Twas brillig, and Michael Scherer at 12/03/12 21:04 did gyre and gimble:
><i> For the sake of documenting :
</I>><i>
</I>><i> ...
</I>><i>
</I>><i> So for thoses 5 reasons, I would say "no", even if I would rather see
</I>><i> this just for free software advancement.
</I>
I originally wrote a reply to this that went through and answered the
individual points. However, on reflection and re-reading of my replies I
felt it was better to just reply generically as I don't want to nit-pick
and do a tit-for-tat type reply here as you're points are all valid and
well reasoned.
Along with the Triage team who do an sterling job, I am the primary
person dealing with fallout from audio issues. I obviously take pride in
the work I do and I in no way want want to jeopardise the reputations of
either Mageia or PulseAudio and as such I will use the revert option
without hesitation for rc if I or anyone else genuinely feels that the
newer version reflects badly on Mageia.
I fully accept the timing sucks here, but considering the lifetime of
mga2 I still feel this is the right direction.
Col
--
Colin Guthrie
colin(at)mageia.org
<A HREF="http://colin.guthr.ie/">http://colin.guthr.ie/</A>
Day Job:
Tribalogic Limited <A HREF="http://www.tribalogic.net/">http://www.tribalogic.net/</A>
Open Source:
Mageia Contributor <A HREF="http://www.mageia.org/">http://www.mageia.org/</A>
PulseAudio Hacker <A HREF="http://www.pulseaudio.org/">http://www.pulseaudio.org/</A>
Trac Hacker <A HREF="http://trac.edgewall.org/">http://trac.edgewall.org/</A>
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="013011.html">[Mageia-dev] Freeze Push Question: pulseaudio
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="013024.html">[Mageia-dev] Freeze Push Question: pulseaudio
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#13018">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#13018">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#13018">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#13018">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>