<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Packagers meeting
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Packagers%20meeting&In-Reply-To=%3Cdff63c5b54d06144c4855ac678db0e8d.squirrel%40mail.rmail.be%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016907.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016915.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Packagers meeting</H1>
<B>AL13N</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Packagers%20meeting&In-Reply-To=%3Cdff63c5b54d06144c4855ac678db0e8d.squirrel%40mail.rmail.be%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Packagers meeting">alien at rmail.be
</A><BR>
<I>Wed Jun 27 17:06:45 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016907.html">[Mageia-dev] Packagers meeting
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016915.html">[Mageia-dev] Packagers meeting
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16930">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16930">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16930">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16930">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>><i> On 27 June 2012 12:38, Maarten Vanraes <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">maarten.vanraes at gmail.com</A>> wrote:
</I>>>>><i> can we have another talk of bug 2317? to find people willing to make a
</I>>>>><i> new patch that's quite more complex?
</I>>>>><i>
</I>>>>><i> ideally bug 2317 should be fixed before backports opens
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> No, it's not related since you can't garanty that every user will get
</I>>>><i> the
</I>>>><i> update prior to use backports.
</I>>>><i> So there's no need to rush...
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> QA team told me that it would increase their workload dramatically, so i
</I>>><i> think there is need rush.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Again, there's no rush to change mgaapplet as anyway, not all users
</I>><i> will use it.
</I>><i> We cannot break those systems...
</I>><i> We have to continue supporting those.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Once a release is released, we've to support it.
</I>><i> It's done.
</I>><i>
</I>
i was under the impression that we would be fixing this for both mgaapplet
and urpmi --update (by changing perl-urpm; like my patch does)
and that we would submit these as updates, so the QA workload goes down
immediately.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016907.html">[Mageia-dev] Packagers meeting
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016915.html">[Mageia-dev] Packagers meeting
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16930">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16930">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16930">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16930">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>