<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20policy%20clarification%20%28and%20discussion%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201206081038.06735.stormi%40laposte.net%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="016441.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="016267.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)</H1>
    <B>Samuel Verschelde</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20policy%20clarification%20%28and%20discussion%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201206081038.06735.stormi%40laposte.net%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)">stormi at laposte.net
       </A><BR>
    <I>Fri Jun  8 10:38:06 CEST 2012</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016441.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposed Feature:Backports_update_applet
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016267.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#16265">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#16265">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#16265">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#16265">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>I re-read the backports policy, and there's a part I think needs to be pointed 
out before people start to backport packages. 

&quot;We need to ensure that upgrades never fail: cauldron must always have a 
higher version/release than in stable releases.&quot;

This statement is true, but implies more than what it says. It means that we 
can't backport a package for Mageia 1 with a higher version than what we have 
in Mageia 2 release (and updates?) media. And this, until we are able to take 
backports into account during upgrades.

Example :
- Mageia 2 has wesnoth 1.10.2 in core/release
- Mageia 1 can't get a higher version in its backports media 

Do you all agree with my understanding of the policy ?

This is a serious limitation to our ability to backport to Mageia (n-1) and 
even to our ability to provide security fixes to backports there (will not 
prevent it, but will prevent to do it by a version upgrade, which is the 
common way to fix that kind of issue in backports).

Maybe we shouldn't open backports for Mageia 1, and make sure upgrade to 
Mageia 3 can take backports from Mageia 2 into account so that backports to 
Mageia 2 are not stopped when Mageia 3 is released. Then we'll be safe.

Samuel
</PRE>



















































<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016441.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposed Feature:Backports_update_applet
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016267.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#16265">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#16265">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#16265">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#16265">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>