[Mageia-dev] Python packaging policy
Shlomi Fish
shlomif at shlomifish.org
Thu Dec 13 09:00:07 CET 2012
Hi Joseph,
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:53:04 +0800
Joseph Wang <joequant at gmail.com> wrote:
> Looking over this page:
>
> https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Python_policy
>
> * python-pyp2rpm is undergoing review right now. Once it's in
> cauldron, I'd like to
> point to that package as something that packagers you should use to
> get a first draft
> of a spec file, I've been working with the Fedora people so that it
> will do both fedora
> and mageia naming conventions.
>
Sounds good. Does it support building for both Python 2.x and Python 3.x (in
case both are supported)?
> * I'd like to add a rule (which is followed by current packages) that
> the prefix "py" should
> generally be removed from a package name. For example pyopencl should be
> called python-opencl. This is the current convention for packages in mageia.
I'm OK with it either way.
>
> * Also for grouping. I'd like to add a rule that Development/Python
> is intended for packages
> which provide general development libraries for python, and if the
> library fits into an obvious
> other category (i.e. python routines for cosmology calculations) those
> should go into the
> other category.
Sounds good.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
Rethinking CPAN - http://shlom.in/rethinking-cpan
<mst> I find it’s usually safe to assume that whatever shlomif’s doing, there
isn’t a good reason for it.
Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .
More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list