<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Package%20removal%20proposal&In-Reply-To=%3C503336B9.8000209%40gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="018242.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="018246.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal</H1>
<B>Guillaume Rousse</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Package%20removal%20proposal&In-Reply-To=%3C503336B9.8000209%40gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal">guillomovitch at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Aug 21 09:20:25 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="018242.html">[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="018246.html">[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#18244">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#18244">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#18244">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#18244">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le 21/08/2012 02:44, Juan Luis Baptiste a écrit :
><i> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Guillaume Rousse
</I>><i> <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">guillomovitch at gmail.com</A>> wrote:
</I>>><i> Le 20/08/2012 21:20, Damien Lallement a écrit :
</I>>>>><i> - ocsinventory-server and ocsinventory-agent: unmaintained, several
</I>>>>><i> pending security updates, better alternatives available (glpi +
</I>>>>><i> fusioninventory-agent)
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> Noooooo, I'm using it for a customer of my company.
</I>>>><i> I think that it's hard to remove this package as glpi/funsioninventory
</I>>>><i> are better alternatives, sure, but not compatible with ocsinventory-*.
</I>>>><i> So, for me, it's not an alternative but an other solution.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> Meaning you're volonteering for maintainership ?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> We're working on these two packages with one of my apprentices, so
</I>><i> there's no need to drop them.
</I>So just take over maintainership. "we're working on it" is not a clear
status.
--
BOFH excuse #61:
not approved by the FCC
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="018242.html">[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="018246.html">[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#18244">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#18244">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#18244">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#18244">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>