<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Xfce%204.10%20released&In-Reply-To=%3CCAOkW%3DmyS34tBgL6hN0-UoCNXz54AN%2B5jOb_KaYCaAvuT%3D_ddVA%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="015023.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="015008.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released</H1>
<B>You-Cheng Hsieh</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Xfce%204.10%20released&In-Reply-To=%3CCAOkW%3DmyS34tBgL6hN0-UoCNXz54AN%2B5jOb_KaYCaAvuT%3D_ddVA%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released">yochenhsieh at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Mon Apr 30 04:02:27 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="015023.html">[Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="015008.html">[Mageia-dev] does librepository really require java-rpmbuild ?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#15057">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#15057">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#15057">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#15057">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>2012/4/29 Jani Välimaa <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">jani.valimaa at gmail.com</A>>:
><i> On 29.04.2012 14:28, You-Cheng Hsieh wrote:
</I>>><i> 2012/4/29 Jani Välimaa <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">jani.valimaa at gmail.com</A>>:
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> Currently we have a mixture of unstable (4.10 pre) and stable (4.8) Xfce
</I>>>><i> pkgs in our repos. IMHO it would be good to have stable versions
</I>>>><i> available to provide as good user experience for Xfce users as possible.
</I>>>><i> I've heard that some users switched to another distro because our Xfce
</I>>>><i> is outdated in mga1. I don't want to see this happening again.
</I>>>><i>
</I>>><i> Are xfce 4.9.x considered as development/testing/unstable releases?
</I>>><i> If so, I think pushing the stable 4.10 release into mageia2 still fits
</I>>><i> our policy.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Yes, 4.9.x ones are development releases.
</I>
We should provide stable versions as much as possible. I would
recommend if you could ask a push for the 4.10 packages to mageia2.
Mix development and stable packages in official release seems
rather... "uncompleted".
However, if development/unstable packages are provided in official
release, I think it should be OK to provide stable versions as
updates. <-- Please correct me if I'm wrong about this part.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="015023.html">[Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="015008.html">[Mageia-dev] does librepository really require java-rpmbuild ?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#15057">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#15057">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#15057">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#15057">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>