<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] RFC: Add versioned require in rpm on rpm-helper
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20RFC%3A%20Add%20versioned%20require%20in%20rpm%20on%20rpm-helper&In-Reply-To=%3C4F8BFF45.4080601%40colin.guthr.ie%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="014331.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="014333.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] RFC: Add versioned require in rpm on rpm-helper</H1>
    <B>Colin Guthrie</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20RFC%3A%20Add%20versioned%20require%20in%20rpm%20on%20rpm-helper&In-Reply-To=%3C4F8BFF45.4080601%40colin.guthr.ie%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] RFC: Add versioned require in rpm on rpm-helper">mageia at colin.guthr.ie
       </A><BR>
    <I>Mon Apr 16 13:15:17 CEST 2012</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="014331.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: Add versioned require in rpm on rpm-helper
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="014333.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: Add versioned require in rpm on rpm-helper
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#14332">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#14332">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#14332">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#14332">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>&lt;snip&gt;

So just to make sure I'm following this right:
 1. Versioned require will fix urpmi-based upgrades.

 2. Installer (fresh-install) will be fine because basesystem-minimal
will pull in rpm which will pull in rpm-helper.  WE can be confident
this will happen early.

 3. Installer (upgrade) will still be broken as it does not treat the
rpm package inside the chroot as any kind of priority update that is
installed early in the upgrade process.

Is that correct?

Col

-- 

Colin Guthrie
colin(at)mageia.org
<A HREF="http://colin.guthr.ie/">http://colin.guthr.ie/</A>

Day Job:
  Tribalogic Limited <A HREF="http://www.tribalogic.net/">http://www.tribalogic.net/</A>
Open Source:
  Mageia Contributor <A HREF="http://www.mageia.org/">http://www.mageia.org/</A>
  PulseAudio Hacker <A HREF="http://www.pulseaudio.org/">http://www.pulseaudio.org/</A>
  Trac Hacker <A HREF="http://trac.edgewall.org/">http://trac.edgewall.org/</A>
</PRE>





















<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="014331.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: Add versioned require in rpm on rpm-helper
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="014333.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: Add versioned require in rpm on rpm-helper
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#14332">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#14332">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#14332">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#14332">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>