<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Anybody having high CPU by kded4 after upgrading to 4.6.90?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Anybody%20having%20high%20CPU%20by%20kded4%20after%20upgrading%0A%09to%204.6.90%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1309498824.99965.YahooMailNeo%40web161706.mail.bf1.yahoo.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="006193.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="006198.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Anybody having high CPU by kded4 after upgrading to 4.6.90?</H1>
<B>Radu-Cristian FOTESCU</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Anybody%20having%20high%20CPU%20by%20kded4%20after%20upgrading%0A%09to%204.6.90%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1309498824.99965.YahooMailNeo%40web161706.mail.bf1.yahoo.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Anybody having high CPU by kded4 after upgrading to 4.6.90?">beranger5ca at yahoo.ca
</A><BR>
<I>Fri Jul 1 07:40:24 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006193.html">[Mageia-dev] Anybody having high CPU by kded4 after upgrading to 4.6.90?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="006198.html">[Mageia-dev] Anybody having high CPU by kded4 after upgrading to 4.6.90?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#6196">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#6196">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#6196">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#6196">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>I was trying to investigate the kded4 high CPU load, and I started to
investigate some upstream reports, even if not necessarily reported for 4.6.90.
Some such reports were related to ntrack, e.g. <A HREF="http://bugs.kde.org/268038">http://bugs.kde.org/268038</A>
What the heck is ntrack and why do we need it? (The official description tells
me exactly nothing).
There is *no* ntrack in either of Mandriva or Fedora -- it's actually likely
to be an Ubuntu project; either way, it's definitely *not* part of the KDE4
project, as it's hosted on <A HREF="https://launchpad.net/ntrack">https://launchpad.net/ntrack</A>
Then why the heck removing libntrack0 wants to remove *all* the KDE???
Is Mageia becoming Kubuntu?
All these excessive dependencies are making me sick. Everything depends on
everything. Is dynamic loading of libraries, with dynamically getting pointers
to functions and using them or not, depending on availability, a mechanism
that only works in Windows?
Then, you'll excuse me, for the fist time in 9 days, I'll reboot into XP SP3.
And I'm doing that because, after having rebooted in F15, their plasma (4.6.3)
crashed on me for 3 times in 5 minutes. This is unbearable.
Pissed off,
R-C aka beranger
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006193.html">[Mageia-dev] Anybody having high CPU by kded4 after upgrading to 4.6.90?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="006198.html">[Mageia-dev] Anybody having high CPU by kded4 after upgrading to 4.6.90?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#6196">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#6196">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#6196">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#6196">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>