<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdenlive-0.8.2-1.mga2 </TITLE> <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5Bchangelog%5D%20%5BRPM%5D%20cauldron%20core/release%0A%09kdenlive-0.8.2-1.mga2&In-Reply-To=%3CCAPZ-hqQgbjHWq807Z4%3DMBg1gp0yYSD-VDVytXPZE5D-UngjwPQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E"> <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="010490.html"> <LINK REL="Next" HREF="010504.html"> </HEAD> <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> <H1>[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdenlive-0.8.2-1.mga2</H1> <B>Juan Luis Baptiste</B> <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5Bchangelog%5D%20%5BRPM%5D%20cauldron%20core/release%0A%09kdenlive-0.8.2-1.mga2&In-Reply-To=%3CCAPZ-hqQgbjHWq807Z4%3DMBg1gp0yYSD-VDVytXPZE5D-UngjwPQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E" TITLE="[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdenlive-0.8.2-1.mga2">juancho at mageia.org </A><BR> <I>Thu Dec 15 21:18:44 CET 2011</I> <P><UL> <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010490.html">[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdenlive-0.8.2-1.mga2 </A></li> <LI>Next message: <A HREF="010504.html">[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdenlive-0.8.2-1.mga2 </A></li> <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> <a href="date.html#10492">[ date ]</a> <a href="thread.html#10492">[ thread ]</a> <a href="subject.html#10492">[ subject ]</a> <a href="author.html#10492">[ author ]</a> </LI> </UL> <HR> <!--beginarticle--> <PRE>On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Florian Hubold <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">doktor5000 at arcor.de</A>> wrote: ><i> Huh? From what i remember the only difference between backports </I>><i> and updates should be that backports are mostly new versions, </I>><i> new features, but the QA should be the same. If that's not the case, </I>><i> seems my memory from the last few meetings played tricks on me. </I>><i> </I> Well we're going off the track of the meaning of this thread but my opinion on this: I agree with Marteen, it would be unrealistic on thinking on putting the same amount of work of QA on backports than in updates. How would be the way to go ? get a list of the new features of a program and have a QA member test each one of them ?? I don't think that's a good idea, it would take a lot of time and the person testing should know fairly enough how the program in question works. In that case the same QA should be put each time a new version of a program is updated in cauldron, and that also is not possible to do. I think in the case of backports tests should be much more lax than in updates: it installs runs and if there's any important bugfix mentioned in the changelog make sure that it is fixed, there's no other way around it. If not then do not have backports at all and let third party repos continue to pop up to fulfill this need. -- Juancho </PRE> <!--endarticle--> <HR> <P><UL> <!--threads--> <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010490.html">[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdenlive-0.8.2-1.mga2 </A></li> <LI>Next message: <A HREF="010504.html">[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdenlive-0.8.2-1.mga2 </A></li> <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> <a href="date.html#10492">[ date ]</a> <a href="thread.html#10492">[ thread ]</a> <a href="subject.html#10492">[ subject ]</a> <a href="author.html#10492">[ author ]</a> </LI> </UL> <hr> <a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev mailing list</a><br> </body></html>