<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Rpmlint configuration, false positives
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Rpmlint%20configuration%2C%20false%20positives&In-Reply-To=%3C4E59FCC4.90406%40laposte.net%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="007614.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="007617.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Rpmlint configuration, false positives</H1>
<B>andre999</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Rpmlint%20configuration%2C%20false%20positives&In-Reply-To=%3C4E59FCC4.90406%40laposte.net%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Rpmlint configuration, false positives">andre999.mga at laposte.net
</A><BR>
<I>Sun Aug 28 10:31:00 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="007614.html">[Mageia-dev] Rpmlint configuration, false positives
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="007617.html">[Mageia-dev] clamav is in updates_testing but QA team got no update request
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#7626">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#7626">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#7626">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#7626">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Michael Scherer a écrit :
><i> Le samedi 27 août 2011 à 22:06 +0200, Florian Hubold a écrit :
</I>>><i> Am 04.03.2011 22:30, schrieb Michael Scherer:
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> But we can filter and configure it to be a little more perfect.
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> In a rather autocratic fashion, as the maintainer of rpmlint ( both packages
</I>>>><i> and uptream ), as a packager representative, and as a apprentice dictator
</I>>>><i> ( since there is lots of open position in this sector since a few weeks ),
</I>>>><i> I propose that this become the canonical source for rpmlint configuration.
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> In practice, that mean that false positives will have to be added there,
</I>>>><i> that stuff that are noted as errors need to be set in that package, and
</I>>>><i> any policy changes must be made there.
</I>
Good idea
[...]
>><i> I think the following are bogus, but i may be totally wrong:
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> *strange-permission * for SOURCES and SPEC it complains if not 0644, why
</I>>><i> is that?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> The question is rather, "why should another permission be used ?". If
</I>><i> not, we can end with 700 or anything weird.
</I>
Like the 600 permissions that actually _did_ occur with Python-docs not too
long ago. We need that warning.
--
André
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="007614.html">[Mageia-dev] Rpmlint configuration, false positives
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="007617.html">[Mageia-dev] clamav is in updates_testing but QA team got no update request
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#7626">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#7626">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#7626">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#7626">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>