<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Rpmlint configuration, false positives
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Rpmlint%20configuration%2C%20false%20positives&In-Reply-To=%3C4E595683.2050004%40arcor.de%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="007611.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="007614.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Rpmlint configuration, false positives</H1>
<B>Florian Hubold</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Rpmlint%20configuration%2C%20false%20positives&In-Reply-To=%3C4E595683.2050004%40arcor.de%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Rpmlint configuration, false positives">doktor5000 at arcor.de
</A><BR>
<I>Sat Aug 27 22:41:39 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="007611.html">[Mageia-dev] Rpmlint configuration, false positives
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="007614.html">[Mageia-dev] Rpmlint configuration, false positives
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#7613">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#7613">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#7613">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#7613">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Am 27.08.2011 22:19, schrieb Michael Scherer:
><i> Le samedi 27 août 2011 à 22:06 +0200, Florian Hubold a écrit :
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> What about the following, AFAIK those are deprecated and rpmlint shouldn't
</I>>><i> complain about:
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> *files-attr-not-set* as i was told by dmorgan, empty default attributes
</I>>><i> (%defattr(-,root,root))
</I>>><i> are useless and not needed, but without it rpmlint complains with this warning
</I>>><i> for every file.
</I>>><i> What's the status quoe here? rpmlint issue or maybe an rpm bug?
</I>>><i> Empty %defattr still needed or not and if not, could you make that warning an
</I>>><i> exception?
</I>><i> TO be really clean, this should be changed directly in rpmlint upstream
</I>><i> to remove the check. But as I do not know the various supported version
</I>><i> for this removal, I will add a filter.
</I>So someone with more insights wrt RPM should comment on this. dmorgan?
><i>
</I>>><i> I think the following are bogus, but i may be totally wrong:
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> *strange-permission * for SOURCES and SPEC it complains if not 0644, why
</I>>><i> is that?
</I>><i> The question is rather, "why should another permission be used ?". If
</I>><i> not, we can end with 700 or anything weird.
</I>See my following mail.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="007611.html">[Mageia-dev] Rpmlint configuration, false positives
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="007614.html">[Mageia-dev] Rpmlint configuration, false positives
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#7613">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#7613">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#7613">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#7613">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>