<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release	firefox-ext-add-on-compatibility-reporter-0.9-1.mga2
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BRPM%5D%20cauldron%20core/release%0A%09firefox-ext-add-on-compatibility-reporter-0.9-1.mga2&In-Reply-To=%3C201108261726.20282.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="007565.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="007568.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release	firefox-ext-add-on-compatibility-reporter-0.9-1.mga2</H1>
    <B>Maarten Vanraes</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BRPM%5D%20cauldron%20core/release%0A%09firefox-ext-add-on-compatibility-reporter-0.9-1.mga2&In-Reply-To=%3C201108261726.20282.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release	firefox-ext-add-on-compatibility-reporter-0.9-1.mga2">maarten.vanraes at gmail.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Fri Aug 26 17:26:20 CEST 2011</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="007565.html">[Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release	firefox-ext-add-on-compatibility-reporter-0.9-1.mga2
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="007568.html">[Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release firefox-ext-add-on-compatibility-reporter-0.9-1.mga2
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#7566">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#7566">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#7566">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#7566">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Op vrijdag 26 augustus 2011 09:56:43 schreef Florian Hubold:
&gt;<i> Am 26.08.2011 09:50, schrieb Sander Lepik:
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 26.08.2011 10:27, Guillaume Rousse kirjutas:
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; I don't see where it is stated than firefox can't get updated until all
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; extensions in the distributions work with it.
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I would call it a regression that shouldn't pass QA. One day your ads
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; ands scripts are blocked and the other day they are not. Great user
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; experience..
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; The large advantage of packaged extensions is that they are managed by
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; sysadmins, instead of users, which makes a difference when they are
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; different people.
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; And even larger disadvantage comes in when they are not updated. Contain
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; memory leaks and so on. The biggest problem here is that the packager who
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; imported those addons is not keeping them up-to-date.
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Sysadmin can copy those extensions into place anyway. Then it's up to
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; him/her to keep them up-to-date. Currently we have to take care of that
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; and we don't (or if anyone wants to claim that we do then we do it
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; really poorly as there are already newer versions of addons that got
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; pushed with latest update).
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> Well, as there are mostly no bigger changes like in %files, can't an update
</I>&gt;<i> of those addons
</I>&gt;<i> be scripted or automated halfway? So someone just needs to push this prior
</I>&gt;<i> to a Firefox update?
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> Not saying i have an opinion pro or against packaged addons, but it is
</I>&gt;<i> really a nuisance
</I>&gt;<i> as those who do the Firefox update also need to update all those addons,
</I>&gt;<i> which is unfair,
</I>&gt;<i> seems to me if it's not the importer/maintainer of those addons who does
</I>&gt;<i> the update.
</I>
thinking about what i said in previous email...

i myself maintain a package which contains a firefox addon. maybe maintainers 
of dependant packages could be notified if the requirement is pushed to 
updates_testing? so they can test if this is working or not?

if anyone maintains a list:

beid-middleware

is the name of the package, and i haven't yet tested if it does work or not.
</PRE>























<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="007565.html">[Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release	firefox-ext-add-on-compatibility-reporter-0.9-1.mga2
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="007568.html">[Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release firefox-ext-add-on-compatibility-reporter-0.9-1.mga2
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#7566">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#7566">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#7566">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#7566">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>