Hi everyone, Before I start going over old NEEDINFO bugs again: According to the triage guide, incomplete bugs should, if the requested info isn't supplied, be closed as INVALID. I don't see anything about originally *valid* bugs, where later additional information was requested (e.g. because it was filed against cauldron and cauldron changed a lot, or because the involved package was updated). I did close those as OLD if the reporter didn't reply. Was that good to do in the first place? If it was good: I'm now wondering how I can keep myself from accidentally closing reports that have *never* been valid, as OLD instead of as INVALID, if I don't take a lot more time to read the reports :/ Cheers, Marja