Here is my proposal for the bugs against mga1 which will be End Of Life in December.

After a quick cleaning we have still '312' Mageia 1 bugs. The deal is to close them.
https://bugs.mageia.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ver%3A1

I will send this message tomorrow or Friday:
(text come from fedora)

>This message is a reminder that Mageia 1 is nearing its end of life.
>Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Mageia will stop maintaining and issuing
>updates for Mageia 1. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it
>remains open with a Mageia 'version' of '1'.
>
>Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to
>fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later
>Mageia version prior to Mageia 1's end of life.
>
>Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not
>be able to fix it before Mageia 1 is end of life.  If you would still like to see
>this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Mageia,
>you are encouraged to click on "Version" and change it against that version
>of Mageia.
>
>Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every releases lifetime,
>sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Mageia
>release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.


And for the 1rst December:

>Mageia 1 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on ''1rst December''. Mageia 1 is no
>longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or
>bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
>
>If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Mageia
>please feel free to click on "Version" change it against that version of Mageia.
>And reopen this bug.
>
>Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Maintenance_of_bug_reports#End_of_life_.28EOL.29_Release
Any objection ?

(btw, Sander95 proposed to add a specific status EOL instead of WONTFIX which seems not a bad ideas.
but if we had right on it be sure users, can reopen themselves the bug)