Le mardi 4 octobre 2011 07:14:50, Marja van Waes a écrit :

> Op 04-10-11 07:05, D.Morgan schreef:

> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Remco Rijnders<remco@webconquest.com> wrote:

> >> Op Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 06:34:15AM +0200 schreef Marja in

> >>

> >> <4E8A8CC7.1010602@xs4all.nl>:

> >>> Hi everyone,

> >>>

> >>> I started to give bugs that were assigned>= (or is it =>)? two months

> >>> ago, but weren't accepted by the assignee, the assigned status.

> >>>

> >>> Anyone disapprove?

> >>

> >> Sounds good to me. If they don't want it, they can assign it back. I

> >> think we do have to follow progress on assigned bugs, but that probably

> >> comes after first triaging all open reports.

> >

> > I am not agree, assigned should use by the developper/pacakger when

> > (s)he actually works on a bugreport. For me you will just break my

> > work flow.

> > _______________________________________________

> > Mageia-bugsquad mailing list

> > Mageia-bugsquad@mageia.org

> > https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-bugsquad

>

> Both thanks for the feedback. I don't want to break anyones workflow, so

> I won't continue.

>

> Maybe it is a better idea, next time I run into this, to ping the

> assignee and remind him the bug was assigned to him/her >= two months ago

Yes, I think so.

Samuel