On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Romain d'Alverny <rdalverny@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:41, Max Quarterpleen <bogusman222@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Romain d'Alverny <rdalverny@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Dark logo on dark background: too dark. With such a dark background,
>> you may preferably use a white monochrome version of the logo;
>> otherwise, like here, you better have no logo at all.
>
> I think it actually fits in very nicely with the coloration and flow of the
> image.

It does not. The logo is not clear, indistinguishable from the
background but still playing with it, with no contrast. It hurts both
the logo and the background.
 
I asked a friend who is colorblind in the red spectrum about the visibility of the logo in this image: http://i.imgur.com/u4jfv.jpg (disregard the JPEG artifacts, Imgur doesn't like PNGs for some reason).
He said that he can see it fine, it doesn't disappear into the image. Unfortunately I don't have a friend who is colorblind in the blues, but I do see how in that case it could be a problem.
Also, I played with my screen brightness and contrast, and there are a few settings where the logo disappears. However, with common "natural" settings it appears quite visible.