From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-webteam/2011-March/000556.html | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-webteam/2011-March/000556.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-webteam/2011-March/000556.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-webteam/2011-March/000556.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-webteam/2011-March/000556.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..db72a4d99 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-webteam/2011-March/000556.html @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + + + + [Mageia-webteam] Questions about the forum + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-webteam] Questions about the forum

+ Maât + maat-ml at vilarem.net +
+ Wed Mar 23 11:47:15 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Le 23/03/2011 11:33, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit :
+> 2011/3/23 Maât <maat-ml at vilarem.net>:
+>> Nope in my mind helping can be done by everyone but helping responsability should go to a dedicated team with partial moderation abilities to take care of forum cleanliness (topics titles, statuses...)
+> Ok, here we disagree. IMHO in a community forum there should not be
+> anybody you can point to and say, "why should I bother, it's his
+> responibility". I saw this too often in forums with such "appointed
+> helpers". My idea of a community forum is that everything should be in
+> the responsibility of the users of that forum, special rights only
+> given to people who are necessary to keep order and enforce rules. In
+> an ideal world everything is done by the users of the forum,
+> moderators would not have anything to do at all but to be there in
+> case of need.
+>
+I agree : we disagree :)
+
+>> But enforcing rules (banning, validating, warning) should not rely on their shoulders
+> Banning should be the very last action, so this should be done by the
+> forum admin after discussion with the moderators.
+>
+
+Global Moderators can play this role... (IINM phpBB3 default roles are thought with that organization in mind)
+
+> Same with erasing posts/threads. This should not be done at all[1].
+> Erasing posts breaks transparency and continuity, makes it hard in
+> case of discussions to evaluate opinions given after a post/thread was
+> erased.
+>
+
+Yup... that's why moderation forum is for : moving illegal topics out of the way without deleting them.
+
+For local posts deletion i think offering later a feature of post content hiding to moderators could be a good way
+
+> [1]  - exception for posts with spam and illegal contents (where
+> illegal means illegal according to French law because the owner of the
+> forum site is in France
+
+Yup the forums are under "Mageia french association" responsability hence we must respect french law indeed :)
+
+ 
+
+
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-webteam +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1