[Mageia-sysadm] Package removal request

Mon May 9 13:47:59 CEST 2011

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:36, nicolas vigier <boklm at mars-attacks.org> wrote:
+> On Mon, 09 May 2011, Colin Guthrie wrote:
+>
+>> 'Twas brillig, and Ahmad Samir at 07/05/11 22:30 did gyre and gimble:
+>> > On 3 March 2011 03:31, Ahmad Samir <ahmadsamir3891 at gmail.com> wrote:
+>> >> Please remove esound binary and src packages:
+>> >> esound-utils
+>> >> lib*esound-devel
+>> >> lib*esound0
+>> >>
+>> >>
+>> >> As has been discussed on the -dev ML, esound should be phased out from
+>> >> the distro.
+>> >>
+>> >> I've rebuilt all the packages that had BR esound-devel, and now
+>> >> nothing requires it in Mageia. (I am wondering if it should be added
+>> >> to the import-to-svn blacklist, to prevent it being resubmitted).
+>> >>
+>> >> I think it should be left in SVN for a while though.
+>> >>
+>> >> --
+>> >> Ahmad Samir
+>> >>
+>> >
+>> > This request was lost in the ML; and now two packages were built
+>> > against esound-devel.
+>> >
+>> > If the esound phasing sounds logical at this stage, I can try building
+>> > those two packages without esound, but then you gotta promise to add
+>> > esound to the blacklist...
+>> >
+>>
+>> I'm certainly all in favour of this! Death to esound!!!
+>
+> I removed esound from the repository. You can now rebuild packages that
+> were built against esound-devel.
+
+http://check.mageia.org/dependencies.html
+
+10 packages buildrequire esound-devel
+
+SDL12
+SDL_mixer
+blender
+bumprace
+csmash
+gkrellm-plugins
+libmikmod
+rocksndiamonds
+soundwrapper
+tritonus
+
+Including 2 which are linked against the lib :
+
+gkrellm-plugins
+tritonus
+