From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003182.html | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003182.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003182.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003182.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003182.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..934ee7016 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003182.html @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ + + + + [Mageia-sysadm] buildsystem => maintdb link test + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-sysadm] buildsystem => maintdb link test

+ Romain d'Alverny + rdalverny at gmail.com +
+ Wed Mar 23 17:07:17 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 17:00, Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> wrote:
+> What about if people do not want to be co-maintainer when they do a
+> massive rebuild ( like for example, when a new version of python is
+> upgraded, I often rebuild everything or push simple rebuild ) ?
+
+Is there a specific flag set when doing this? or can the buildsystem
+detect that the upload is more about just rebuilding than pushing a
+change?
+
+Nonetheless, we can consider that co-maintainers would be those whose
+activity is significant on a given package - unless massive rebuilds
+occurs at about the same (or a higher) frequency as regular
+maintainance uploads.
+
+> And I also think you should see with people on -dev about this.
+> ( this and about the stats )
+
+Yep. Moving the discussion there then.
+
+Romain
+
+ + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-sysadm +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1