From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003015.html | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 122 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003015.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003015.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003015.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003015.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..00bd9c821 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003015.html @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ + + + + [Mageia-sysadm] [RPM] cauldron core/release tagtool-0.12.3-2.mga1 + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-sysadm] [RPM] cauldron core/release tagtool-0.12.3-2.mga1

+ nicolas vigier + boklm at mars-attacks.org +
+ Fri Mar 4 20:17:35 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
+
+> Le jeudi 03 mars 2011 à 18:17 +0100, nicolas vigier a écrit :
+> > On Thu, 03 Mar 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
+> 
+> > > > I think that's not a problem here. We're not checking ID of people who
+> > > > create accounts, so they can use the name they want to be called.
+> > > 
+> > > Not yet. What about the day someone will propose to use gpg and the web
+> > > of trust ( who is currently based on checking ID card ) for some stuff ?
+> > 
+> > If we decide one day that we require signed gpg key, then we can discuss
+> > that day the details of what kind of signatures we require. Today we
+> > don't require anything like this. But it's possible to sign key without
+> > checking ID card. GPG signature doesn't necessarily mean "this personn
+> > has this official name", it can also mean "this is the real owner of
+> > this email, and owner of this non-official name".
+> 
+> That's why I said "what if we use gpg _and_ the web of trust". Of
+> course, gpg alone do not requires this. The current system of web of
+> trust does.
+> 
+> So while we do not do now, I wanted to highlight this would be something
+> to keep in mind.
+> 
+> > > Problem is asking for Last name/First name.
+> > > 
+> > > Identity.m.o  will be used almost everywhere, like for example on the
+> > > forum. 
+> > > 
+> > > Some people may find invasive to give Last name/First name especially
+> > > for posting on a forum when compared to all others ( I checked several
+> > > french forums, none requires giving anything except a email and a
+> > > login ). 
+> > 
+> > Many forums require a username, and a display name. 
+> 
+> I gave examples of those that do not requires anything when being
+> subscribed ( and later ), so I would appreciate that you give at least
+> one example ( cause all I tested didn't seems to mandate this on
+> registering ). 
+> 
+> Likely all of them propose to have a display name, none do requires it
+> ( ie, using login is fine, not filling the vcard is fine too ).
+
+All forums using IPBoard seems to require a display name. For example :
+http://community.invisionpower.com/index.php?app=core&module=global&section=register&coppa_user=&termsread=1&coppa_pass=1
+
+> 
+> > If you open an
+> > account on linuxfr for instance, you need to enter a login name, and a
+> > full name (which doesn't have to be your real name). 
+> 
+> Sorry to contradict you, but that's not required when subscribing :
+> https://linuxfr.org/compte/inscription
+> 
+> ( note that maybe this changed for the new version 2 weeks ago )
+> 
+> You can set a display name later ( and yes, the new interface now ask
+> for "first name/last name", I do not remind the old one ), but IIRC you
+> do not need to set it. That's the whole point, you are not forced ( or
+> at least, it was like this before ).
+
+Yes it seems I was wrong. I saw it in the settings and assumed it was
+asked when creating the account but it is not.
+
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-sysadm +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1