From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-January/002244.html | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-January/002244.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-January/002244.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-January/002244.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-January/002244.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..50a2580f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-January/002244.html @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + + [Mageia-sysadm] Setup for rabbit + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-sysadm] Setup for rabbit

+ Luca Berra + bluca at vodka.it +
+ Wed Jan 19 08:04:36 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 05:34:55PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
+>> >> Not if we have daily isos for testing
+>> >
+>> > Daily is maybe too much. Why not weekly ?
+>> 
+>> Depends on context, but if something breaks (ISO coherence, install,
+>> usees), it is better to know it the day after rather than the week
+>> after (provided we do execute our first batch of tests on it)?
+>
+>Well, we would first have automated tests, as I doubt we will find
+>people who install every day.
+>I would be in favor of rebuilding 1 iso every day too, depending on the
+>load, and send errors if the iso is not created. 
+>
+>But we should know how long it take.
+>
+>Maybe we can have hourly rebuild :)
+yes please and make it send a mail on this list in case it should fail,
+so it can be promptly fixed :P
+
+L.
+
+-- 
+Luca Berra -- bluca at vodka.it
+
+ + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-sysadm +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1