From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-February/002787.html | 176 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 176 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-February/002787.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-February/002787.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-February/002787.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-February/002787.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..483f0d945 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-February/002787.html @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ + + + + [Mageia-sysadm] LDAP group for translator, delegation + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-sysadm] LDAP group for translator, delegation

+ Wolfgang Bornath + molch.b at googlemail.com +
+ Sat Feb 19 16:17:42 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
2011/2/19 Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org>:
+> Hi,
+>
+> After the meeting of i18n, where people asked me to come to discuss tx, I
+> discovered
+> that it was not working for people outside of me, due to various acl issues.
+>
+> So now this is fixed ( rev 1139 ), there is the question of who should
+> access transifex.
+>
+> Jehane on #mageia-i18N proposed to have the access for each tranlator (
+> sound good ),
+> and I proposed to restrict staff/super user privileges to team leader. ( I
+> do not know yet
+> what it mean for transifex ).
+>
+> First question :
+>
+> Should we have 1 big group for that, and let people manage the various
+> subteams outside
+> of ldap, or have 1 group per language ?
+>
+> 1 big group is easier, and we can delegate the management to 1/2 person ( ie
+> i18n team leader ).
+>
+> Several group is IMHO more scalable, but this requires more work on our
+> side. And this will not
+> map to permission on tx and the blog, among others.
+
+1 big group will surely mean less work for all involved, it also means
+more discipline for the translators/ language team leaders. :)
+
+If I understand previous discussions correctly this has nothing to do
+with the commit permissions (pushing translated files to svn).
+
+For safety reasons (bus error) I suggest to go for 2 person management.
+
+> Second question :
+>
+> For delegation, I know that some stuff are planned in catdap, but for the
+> moment do people think
+> this is ok to place team leader as owner of the group in ldap, and ask them
+> to use a ldap editor ( for those
+> that know it, of course ). The connexion should be secured, and the access
+> should be simple enough, but
+> we should better check twice
+>
+> --
+> Michael Scherer
+> _______________________________________________
+> Mageia-sysadm mailing list
+> Mageia-sysadm at mageia.org
+> https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-sysadm
+>
+
+-- 
+wobo
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-sysadm +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1