From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-February/002717.html | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-February/002717.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-February/002717.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-February/002717.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-February/002717.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..34d15ca12 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-February/002717.html @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ + + + + [Mageia-sysadm] new group created in ldap + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-sysadm] new group created in ldap

+ Michael Scherer + misc at zarb.org +
+ Fri Feb 11 11:31:39 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Le vendredi 11 février 2011 à 09:33 +0100, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
+> Le vendredi 11 février 2011 00:32:55, Michael Scherer a écrit :
+> > Le jeudi 10 février 2011 à 23:26 +0100, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
+> > > Le jeudi 10 février 2011 21:56:32, Michael Scherer a écrit :
+> > > > Hi, I have created the group mga-founders to hold the uid of founders.
+> > > > Just FYI.
+> > > >
+> > > > Since we start to have lots of group, I suggest that we start using the
+> > > > description attribute, to store information about the goal of each
+> > > > group ( just checked the rfc, after thomas suggested ).
+> > > >
+> > > > Or should we also track this on the wiki ?
+> > >
+> > > Has the concept of "founders" still a meaning now that we have a board
+> > > and team council representatives ? I thought the "founders" were only a
+> > > temporary group meant to let place to the council and the board.
+> > 
+> > According to statutes, yes :
+> > http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=mageia_org_statutes
+> > See article 6.
+> > 
+> > And according to Article 12, the founders are part of the assembly, no
+> > matter their statutes ( from my understanding ). This is not clear if a
+> > founder moved to the status of honor member ( article 6, again ) must be
+> > present to the assembly or not.
+> > 
+> 
+> Except if there is a legal reason for that, I don' understand why there's such 
+> a distinction between founder members and active members. To me, this is 
+> exactly the same thing, the founders being just the first active members.
+>
+> Now that I read the statuses, I see that in pratice, founders have no different 
+> practical role than active members. Then I still maintain I don't see what the 
+> distinction between founders and active members is for.
+
+The statuts are not the only thing governing ldap. For example : 
+http://meetbot.mageia.org/mageia-meeting/2011/mageia-meeting.2011-01-17-19.36.log.html#l-52
+
+The meeting said "founders", not "board", nor "active member". So I need
+this.
+
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-sysadm +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1