From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-October/000064.html | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-October/000064.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-October/000064.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-October/000064.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-October/000064.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d2a7c371e --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-October/000064.html @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ + + + + [Mageia-sysadm] planning for sysadmin task + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-sysadm] planning for sysadmin task

+ nicolas vigier + boklm at mars-attacks.org +
+ Tue Oct 26 16:40:13 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
+
+> 
+> From the experience I had with epoll, seting-up the application were
+> complicated in past due by the lack of dependencies in the rpm or on
+> perl side.
+> Epoll need a lot of perl module, mainly because Catalyst is splitted in
+> several part.
+> 
+> I solved the issue since (on both perl side and rpm side).
+> 
+> Since you prefer to not using rpm, the work to setup such application
+> get more complicated, especially if the sys admin don't know perl (in
+> this case, the same apply to php apps, python, etc...).
+
+It's not "not using rpm at all for any web apps". I think we can use RPM
+packages when it's more convenient. In some cases such as epoll, it can
+be more convenient to use an RPM. But not in all cases. I think it
+depends on the application, and how we use it.
+
+For the main mageia.org website for instance, do we want to use a
+package that we will have to update, rebuild, and ask an admin to
+install it, each time someone in the web team wants to fix a typo ?
+
+Nicolas
+
+
+ + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-sysadm +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1