From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-November/000964.html | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-November/000964.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-November/000964.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-November/000964.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-November/000964.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..92df239aa --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-November/000964.html @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + + [Mageia-sysadm] [LONG] sympa ( and web apps ) ldap authentication + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-sysadm] [LONG] sympa ( and web apps ) ldap authentication

+ nicolas vigier + boklm at mars-attacks.org +
+ Fri Nov 26 02:10:25 CET 2010 +

+
+ +
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Michael Scherer wrote:
+
+> 
+> - find a way to ensure unicity of email for the secondary emails that
+> user can enter. If possible, on the ldap level directly, but maybe doing
+> it on catdap level would be enough. I would feel safer to have this at
+> ldap level for obvious reasons of data integrity.
+> 
+> 
+> - once we have enabled and checked it, and ensured that this is not a
+> potential source of problem, enable the use of the secondary email as a
+> login, in addition to username and primary email
+> 
+> ( this should not requires much patching of application, but if needed,
+> same rule as previously apply ).
+
+Is it really needed to allow users to enter secondary emails ? How will
+they be used ?
+
+> So, is everybody ok with this plan ?
+
+I'm ok. Except maybe for the secondary emails, I don't know if it is
+useful to allow multiple emails.
+
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-sysadm +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1