From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-November/000934.html | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-November/000934.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-November/000934.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-November/000934.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-November/000934.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..fc4344f5c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2010-November/000934.html @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + + [Mageia-sysadm] Main tasks for the next days + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-sysadm] Main tasks for the next days

+ Olivier Blin + mageia at blino.org +
+ Thu Nov 25 17:43:23 CET 2010 +

+
+ +
Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> writes:
+
+> Le jeudi 25 novembre 2010 à 13:18 +0100, Olivier Blin a écrit :
+>> Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> writes:
+>
+>> > In fact, it depend on what you call "private svn" exactly. Who will have
+>> > access, who decide, etc.
+>> >  ( and private is maybe not really open enough )
+>> 
+>> I mean that svn should not be publicily available, and packages should
+>> not be propagated on mirrors.
+>> Maybe this bootstrap svn could be made available to trusted contributors
+>> (founders + Mandriva contributors) first, and this restriction could be
+>> lifted when the basesystem packages are clean enough to be made public.
+>
+> I still do not see the issue.
+>
+> In fact, the question is how doing it privately would be less a problem
+> than doing it publicly. 
+
+By not having sources explicitely using the Mandriva brand in a
+repository we make public.
+
+-- 
+Olivier Blin - blino
+
+ + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-sysadm +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1