[Mageia-sysadm] [188] First commit for the puppet bugzilla module

Mon Nov 8 02:29:59 CET 2010

Le lundi 08 novembre 2010 à 00:05 +0100, Dexter Morgan a écrit :
+> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Michael scherer <misc at zarb.org> wrote:
+> > On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 03:56:29PM +0100, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
+> >> On 7 November 2010 03:17, Michael scherer <misc at zarb.org> wrote:
+> >> > we didn't really decide to install bugzilla, according to the meeting agenda for
+> >> > monday. While it may be the one we end to choose, it doesn't have xml-rpc
+> >> > (requested by stormi for mageia-app-db, see discuss ml)
+> >>
+> >> err...
+> >> http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/3.6/en/html/api/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/XMLRPC.html
+> >
+> > That's nice that it changed, I was not sure since we never used it at mandriva
+> > ( now, we may have used a older version, which would have explained it ).
+> > Yet, we need to find if it fullfill stormi's need ( but I assume it will ).
+> >
+> >> > and it is notable that users do find bugzilla intuitive.
+> >>
+> >> I'm not sure of that.
+> >
+> > Well, some people complained of it :/
+> > ( that doesn't mean they are right, but at least, we can take
+> > this in account ).
+> 
+> what bug trackers do you propose ?
+> we need to go quite quick to have this available.
+
+We first need to know for whom it must be available and who will use it.
+ 
+for packagers ? for coders ? for webteam ?
+for other teams ( like us ) ? 
+
+If so, did we take the time to ask "what would you need in a bug
+tracker", as this will have a impact on the model and field ( ie, if we
+force version/release/srpm, this will not mean much for sysadm bugs, if
+we add a field for the server, this is not useful for others, etc ).
+
+What I think we should do first is gather list of requirements, see how
+and who will use it, and then decide.
+
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+