From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-marketing/2012-June/000920.html | 188 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 188 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-marketing/2012-June/000920.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-marketing/2012-June/000920.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-marketing/2012-June/000920.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-marketing/2012-June/000920.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e8b8de1cd --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-marketing/2012-June/000920.html @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@ + + + + [Mageia-marketing] marcom + artwork + web => atelier ? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-marketing] marcom + artwork + web => atelier ?

+ Max Quarterpleen + bogusman222 at gmail.com +
+ Mon Jun 11 11:01:58 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Romain d'Alverny <rdalverny at gmail.com>wrote:
+
+> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Max Quarterpleen <bogusman222 at gmail.com>
+> wrote:
+> > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Romain d'Alverny <rdalverny at gmail.com>
+> >>  - this team is named "atelier";
+> >
+> > My French is a little rusty. Does that mean "workshop"?
+>
+> Yes.
+>
+> > Who came up with that name?
+>
+> Doesn't matter. It's just picked to have something.
+>
+
+OK, sounds good.
+
+
+>
+> > How is it pronounced?
+>
+> /a.tə.lje/ see http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/atelier
+>
+> > And why? (I personally was starting to like webartcom)
+>
+> webartcom is reductive - and ugly.
+>
+> >>  - a new mailing-list is open for that;
+> >
+> > Are all participants of -marcom, -web and -artwork automatically
+> subscribed
+> > to this new list? What is the address? (So I can create a new mail
+> filter)
+>
+> This list is not registered yet. All participants will have to
+> subscribe, an update message stating each former list being closed and
+> directions to subscribe to the new list will be sent.
+>
+> >>  - existing web, marcom and artwork lists are kept for archive, but
+> >> locked down and all subscribers are unsubscribed;
+> >
+> > When will this happen?
+>
+> As soon as 3 or 4 people can agree on a plan and there's no large
+> objection from others, and Council validates it. A good time would be
+> by the end of this week.
+>
+
+Count me in. I don't know how much I'll be able to help, I've got a lot
+going in in meatspace now, but I really do want to see things moving along
+on this.
+What kind of plan do we need? (Maybe start that in a new thread?)
+
+
+>
+> >>  - will have a say in whatever happens in this team, only those making
+> >> and contributing things (so here, actionable designs, working code,
+> >> graphics or copy, etc.); opinions and feedback from others still
+> >> welcome, but not enough to move forward;
+> >
+> > So, sort of a reward for participating? Interesting.... but might not
+> work.
+>
+> Then what would you suggest that would work better?
+>
+> Here it's not a reward; it's a right, if you participate/make things
+> or if you're included by the team peers; and it's how it happens in
+> other teams (packagers, dev, sysadmin, qa, i18n, etc.
+>
+
+Yes, I can see that. But part of the problem that we've had recently is
+with people not contributing.
+It's fine to say "If you contribute then you get a say in what happens" but
+if nobody is contributing....
+I can't really think of any alternative, since it is a very good way to do
+things.
+I'm just a little concerned about people not contributing.
+
+
+>
+> >>  - external contributions are a true option; that is, one team peer
+> >> getting in touch/inviting a professional person [...]
+> >
+> > I think iamoverrated has already started doing this with a graphic
+> designer.
+> > I'm not sure on the details, we've been playing IRC tag for a week or
+> so...
+>
+> Oh, that's great then. That would be even greater that details (what
+> work, what scope, when, how, etc.) and progress are posted on this
+> list so that things are not wasted or duplicated in the end.
+>
+>
+I'll ping him and see what he can tell us.
+
+
+> >>  - formatting our resources so that one-shot contributions from
+> >> external people are made easier is a true option too (that means
+> >> things easier to grasp, understand and update);
+> >
+> > How?
+>
+> I don't know. At this time, I only can find GitHub's "fork and pull"
+> way very inspiring
+> (https://help.github.com/articles/using-pull-requests) + more
+> documentation on how/why things are as they are.
+>
+> >>  - no more meeting, we plan and do things, and update everyone through
+> >> the mailing-list (or other, but asynchronous); so being on IRC is not
+> >> a must, just good to have;
+> >
+> > Where will we be hanging out? New channel? One of the existing channels?
+>
+> We'll see. "No meeting" policy doesn't prevent from chatting, hopefully :-p
+>
+
+Indeed.
+
+
+> _______________________________________________
+> Mageia-marketing mailing list
+> Mageia-marketing at mageia.org
+> https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-marketing
+>
+-------------- next part --------------
+An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
+URL: </pipermail/mageia-marketing/attachments/20120611/2412edb4/attachment-0001.html>
+
+ + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-marketing +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1