From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- .../attachments/20110607/2c6f779a/attachment-0001.html | 9 +++++++++ .../mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/2c6f779a/attachment.html | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/2c6f779a/attachment-0001.html create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/2c6f779a/attachment.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/2c6f779a') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/2c6f779a/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/2c6f779a/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f0c3e4824 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/2c6f779a/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +
2011/6/7 Olav Vitters <olav@vitters.nl>
+On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:48:55AM +0200, Thomas Lottmann wrote:
+> On the other hand, I'd like to still have the possibility to keep
+> and install Gnome 2.xx in the future, as Gnome 3 isn't both stable
+> and reliable and complete yet.
+
+GNOME 2.x is not needed, there is the fallback mode in GNOME3; it'll
+give you a gnome-panel and so on. The default layout looks like
+GNOME-shell, but it just is a newer gnome-panel.
Fallback mode would be killed someday....

I don't think that a good statement to argue that GNOME3 can replace

GNOME2.
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/2c6f779a/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/2c6f779a/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f0c3e4824 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/2c6f779a/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +
2011/6/7 Olav Vitters <olav@vitters.nl>
+On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:48:55AM +0200, Thomas Lottmann wrote:
+> On the other hand, I'd like to still have the possibility to keep
+> and install Gnome 2.xx in the future, as Gnome 3 isn't both stable
+> and reliable and complete yet.
+
+GNOME 2.x is not needed, there is the fallback mode in GNOME3; it'll
+give you a gnome-panel and so on. The default layout looks like
+GNOME-shell, but it just is a newer gnome-panel.
Fallback mode would be killed someday....

I don't think that a good statement to argue that GNOME3 can replace

GNOME2.
-- cgit v1.2.1