From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- .../20101213/9f575b59/attachment-0001.html | 34 +++++++++++++++++++ .../attachments/20101213/9f575b59/attachment.html | 34 +++++++++++++++++++ .../20101213/f1732db1/attachment-0001.html | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../attachments/20101213/f1732db1/attachment.html | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 144 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/9f575b59/attachment-0001.html create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/9f575b59/attachment.html create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/f1732db1/attachment-0001.html create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/f1732db1/attachment.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/9f575b59/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/9f575b59/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..92c15e339 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/9f575b59/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +

+ +
+I want to point to skiper's blog, who gave the whole "Logo" issue some
+thought. It is titled, "Mageia logo - I don't like it".
+
+But what he writes is very different from the usual "I don't like it,
+it's ugly" posts. I explains in detail why he does not like it and why
+he thinks it is not a good choice based on objective reasons. Although
+I do not share his opinion I want to give credit to him because he did
+not just complain, he put some thinking and time into explaining his
+opinion.
+
+BTW: He explicitely states that he does not complain about the
+decision finding process.
+
+  http://skiperdrake.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/mageia-logo-i-am-not-happy-with-it/
+
+Good reading, even if it is not my opinion :)
+
+Thank you for commenting and expressing your point of view as well. ;-)
+
+I did complete my article a little bit more for two other kinds of logo to fit in, including some details I though interesting. I should have mentioned all this before, and I also precised a little bit more my thought of the chosen logo.
+ +
+But none of the less, it is still worth remembering there has been a lot of work made on Mageia generally as well as on the logo. So I renew my confidence and encouragements towards those who currently work hard on the project. :-)
+ +
+Now, this is just intended to offer a little though about all this logo episode, nothing more.
+
+Cheers,
+
+Skiper.
+



--
Mandriva Linux 2010 spring + kde 4.3.2
think it,be diferent,be gnu/linux

diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/9f575b59/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/9f575b59/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..92c15e339 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/9f575b59/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +

+ +
+I want to point to skiper's blog, who gave the whole "Logo" issue some
+thought. It is titled, "Mageia logo - I don't like it".
+
+But what he writes is very different from the usual "I don't like it,
+it's ugly" posts. I explains in detail why he does not like it and why
+he thinks it is not a good choice based on objective reasons. Although
+I do not share his opinion I want to give credit to him because he did
+not just complain, he put some thinking and time into explaining his
+opinion.
+
+BTW: He explicitely states that he does not complain about the
+decision finding process.
+
+  http://skiperdrake.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/mageia-logo-i-am-not-happy-with-it/
+
+Good reading, even if it is not my opinion :)
+
+Thank you for commenting and expressing your point of view as well. ;-)
+
+I did complete my article a little bit more for two other kinds of logo to fit in, including some details I though interesting. I should have mentioned all this before, and I also precised a little bit more my thought of the chosen logo.
+ +
+But none of the less, it is still worth remembering there has been a lot of work made on Mageia generally as well as on the logo. So I renew my confidence and encouragements towards those who currently work hard on the project. :-)
+ +
+Now, this is just intended to offer a little though about all this logo episode, nothing more.
+
+Cheers,
+
+Skiper.
+



--
Mandriva Linux 2010 spring + kde 4.3.2
think it,be diferent,be gnu/linux

diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/f1732db1/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/f1732db1/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c5710ab0a --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/f1732db1/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +sorry but I don’t like
+

+
+
+I want to point to skiper's blog, who gave the whole "Logo" issue some
+thought. It is titled, "Mageia logo - I don't like it".
+
+But what he writes is very different from the usual "I don't like it,
+it's ugly" posts. I explains in detail why he does not like it and why
+he thinks it is not a good choice based on objective reasons. Although
+I do not share his opinion I want to give credit to him because he did
+not just complain, he put some thinking and time into explaining his
+opinion.
+
+BTW: He explicitely states that he does not complain about the
+decision finding process.
+
+  http://skiperdrake.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/mageia-logo-i-am-not-happy-with-it/
+
+Good reading, even if it is not my opinion :)
+
+Thank you for commenting and expressing your point of view as well. ;-)
+
+I did complete my article a little bit more for two other kinds of logo to fit in, including some details I though interesting. I should have mentioned all this before, and I also precised a little bit more my thought of the chosen logo.
+ + +
+But none of the less, it is still worth remembering there has been a lot of work made on Mageia generally as well as on the logo. So I renew my confidence and encouragements towards those who currently work hard on the project. :-)
+ + +
+Now, this is just intended to offer a little though about all this logo episode, nothing more.
+
+Cheers,
+
+Skiper.
+



--
Mandriva Linux 2010 spring + kde 4.3.2
think it,be diferent,be gnu/linux

+



--
Mandriva Linux 2010 spring + kde 4.3.2
think it,be diferent,be gnu/linux

diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/f1732db1/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/f1732db1/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c5710ab0a --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101213/f1732db1/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +sorry but I don’t like
+

+
+
+I want to point to skiper's blog, who gave the whole "Logo" issue some
+thought. It is titled, "Mageia logo - I don't like it".
+
+But what he writes is very different from the usual "I don't like it,
+it's ugly" posts. I explains in detail why he does not like it and why
+he thinks it is not a good choice based on objective reasons. Although
+I do not share his opinion I want to give credit to him because he did
+not just complain, he put some thinking and time into explaining his
+opinion.
+
+BTW: He explicitely states that he does not complain about the
+decision finding process.
+
+  http://skiperdrake.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/mageia-logo-i-am-not-happy-with-it/
+
+Good reading, even if it is not my opinion :)
+
+Thank you for commenting and expressing your point of view as well. ;-)
+
+I did complete my article a little bit more for two other kinds of logo to fit in, including some details I though interesting. I should have mentioned all this before, and I also precised a little bit more my thought of the chosen logo.
+ + +
+But none of the less, it is still worth remembering there has been a lot of work made on Mageia generally as well as on the logo. So I renew my confidence and encouragements towards those who currently work hard on the project. :-)
+ + +
+Now, this is just intended to offer a little though about all this logo episode, nothing more.
+
+Cheers,
+
+Skiper.
+



--
Mandriva Linux 2010 spring + kde 4.3.2
think it,be diferent,be gnu/linux

+



--
Mandriva Linux 2010 spring + kde 4.3.2
think it,be diferent,be gnu/linux

-- cgit v1.2.1