From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- .../20100925/c5c7ebac/attachment-0001.html | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../attachments/20100925/c5c7ebac/attachment.html | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 118 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100925/c5c7ebac/attachment-0001.html create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100925/c5c7ebac/attachment.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100925/c5c7ebac') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100925/c5c7ebac/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100925/c5c7ebac/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..63ddf1a6a --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100925/c5c7ebac/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ + + + + + + +
+
+ Le 25/09/2010 16:54, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI a écrit : +

On Saturday 25 September 2010, my mailbox was graced by a missive
+ from Farfouille <farfouille64@free.fr> who wrote:
+
+

If one compare a C/Gobject program with its equivalent in Vala, it is 
+obvious that it will have fewer bugs in Vala version, just because there 
+less lines of code hence less places where bugs can hide.
+

 
+This argument does not hold water. I used to program in APL, progs were 
+usually very short (a complex prog had less than a few dozen lines), and could 
+be full of bugs.
+ 
+Cheers,
+ 
+Ron.
+

+ Please don't compare APL with the languages aforementioned.
+ Quote from Wikipedia about APL :
+ "Because of its condensed nature and non-standard characters, APL + has sometimes been termed a "write-only language", and reading + an APL program can at first feel like decoding Egyptian + hieroglyphics. Because of the unusual character set, many programmers use + special keyboards with + APL keytops for authoring APL code."
+
+ My argument is about C/Gobject and Vala not about any languages. + Vala has been developed with the goal of easing Glib programming. + That's why the comparison of program length makes sense.
+
+ Cheers,
+
+ Farfouille.
+
+
+ + diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100925/c5c7ebac/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100925/c5c7ebac/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..63ddf1a6a --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100925/c5c7ebac/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ + + + + + + +
+
+ Le 25/09/2010 16:54, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI a écrit : +

On Saturday 25 September 2010, my mailbox was graced by a missive
+ from Farfouille <farfouille64@free.fr> who wrote:
+
+

If one compare a C/Gobject program with its equivalent in Vala, it is 
+obvious that it will have fewer bugs in Vala version, just because there 
+less lines of code hence less places where bugs can hide.
+

 
+This argument does not hold water. I used to program in APL, progs were 
+usually very short (a complex prog had less than a few dozen lines), and could 
+be full of bugs.
+ 
+Cheers,
+ 
+Ron.
+