From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- .../20100921/d1dfc11f/attachment-0001.html | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../attachments/20100921/d1dfc11f/attachment.html | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/d1dfc11f/attachment-0001.html create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/d1dfc11f/attachment.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/d1dfc11f') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/d1dfc11f/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/d1dfc11f/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2b7b7682a --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/d1dfc11f/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +

2010/9/21 Tux99 <tux99-mga@uridium.org>
+
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, vfmBOFH wrote:
+>
+
> I did not say that representatives are decison makers. As its position
+> indicates, they "represent" their respective communities. Their vote (or
+> decision) *must* be their communities one.
+
+
There is no need for representative democracy on the Internet, arranging
+local poll in each community and then a global one where the community
+reps vote takes more time and effort than a single global poll.
 
And what about people who don't undersand english, for example?
 
+ +
+All that's needed is direct links to the global poll from the local
+community web sites so everyone can partecipate.

And what happens if the options in the poll doesn't fit with a specific community needs?
 
+ +

+> The "central hub" should be seen as a "parliament", where users (who have
+> previously elected their representatives) are represented.
+
+
Completely disagree. And what about those Mageia users that don't have a
+local community or that prefer spending their time on the global forum
+rather than in local forums?

As same in the parliaments in the Real World (TM) there are mixed groups whith their own voice and vote.

+ +
+Again there is zero need for a representative democracy on the Internet.
+It only distorts the true wishes of the users and potentially creates
+local ego-power-positions that only cause controversy and in-fights.

I think in a representative meritocracy, in fact... No place for egos and controversy are if the work is evaluated.
 
+
+

+_______________________________________________
+Mageia-discuss mailing list
+Mageia-discuss@mageia.org
+https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss
+

diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/d1dfc11f/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/d1dfc11f/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2b7b7682a --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/d1dfc11f/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +

2010/9/21 Tux99 <tux99-mga@uridium.org>
+
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, vfmBOFH wrote:
+>
+
> I did not say that representatives are decison makers. As its position
+> indicates, they "represent" their respective communities. Their vote (or
+> decision) *must* be their communities one.
+
+
There is no need for representative democracy on the Internet, arranging
+local poll in each community and then a global one where the community
+reps vote takes more time and effort than a single global poll.
 
And what about people who don't undersand english, for example?
 
+ +
+All that's needed is direct links to the global poll from the local
+community web sites so everyone can partecipate.

And what happens if the options in the poll doesn't fit with a specific community needs?
 
+ +

+> The "central hub" should be seen as a "parliament", where users (who have
+> previously elected their representatives) are represented.
+
+
Completely disagree. And what about those Mageia users that don't have a
+local community or that prefer spending their time on the global forum
+rather than in local forums?

As same in the parliaments in the Real World (TM) there are mixed groups whith their own voice and vote.

+ +
+Again there is zero need for a representative democracy on the Internet.
+It only distorts the true wishes of the users and potentially creates
+local ego-power-positions that only cause controversy and in-fights.

I think in a representative meritocracy, in fact... No place for egos and controversy are if the work is evaluated.
 
+
+

+_______________________________________________
+Mageia-discuss mailing list
+Mageia-discuss@mageia.org
+https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss
+

-- cgit v1.2.1