From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- .../20100920/4b058a00/attachment-0001.html | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../attachments/20100920/4b058a00/attachment.html | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100920/4b058a00/attachment-0001.html create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100920/4b058a00/attachment.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100920/4b058a00') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100920/4b058a00/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100920/4b058a00/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..73b23d296 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100920/4b058a00/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +I fully agree with this opinion. Linux-libre should be offered to free software addict users while propierty drives and other non-free software included as a choice.

2010/9/20 Filipe Saraiva <filip.saraiva@gmail.com>
+
It would be good to give this to the user. I agree with her.
+ +
Em 19 de setembro de 2010 17:50, André Machado <andreferreiramachado@yahoo.com.br> escreveu:
+
+
People,

Now that the distro is starting, it's easier to define the course of the project. We have to make sure we're doing the right thing.
+ +
Something to be discussed is whether the distro will follow the guidelines of the FSF and have only free software on it. This is something to be widely discussed: support for the Stallman's group could be very advantageous, but would sacrifice the end user experience. Proprietary software could be placed in a separate repository. Another point is that according GPL, all source code should be available.
+ +
But something the distro MUST have as an option to the user - that would bring a lot of free software activists for our side - regardless of the choice to be made in relation to this requirement as is the ability to install your kernel linux-libre .
+ +
Basically, linux-libre is a fork of the Linux + kernel maintained by the FSF Latin America that has no binary blobs. Currently, there are very few distros that offer it.

I believe he should be in the repositories or on the installation media, where the user can install a system with it by typing something like "install = libre" or something similar at boot time of this media. Of course, we offer regular Linux kernel as default.
+ +
For more information, see: http://www.fsfla.org/svnwiki/selibre/linux-libre/

+ + + +  
_______________________________________________
+Mageia-discuss mailing list
+Mageia-discuss@mageia.org
+https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss
+



--
Filipe Saraiva
**************************************
Meu blog: http://www.liberdadenafronteira.blogspot.com/
+ +
Associação Piauiense de Software Livre
Projeto Software Livre - Piauí - PSL-PI

“Você deve ser a mudança que deseja ver no mundo.” - Gandhi

+
_______________________________________________
+Mageia-discuss mailing list
+Mageia-discuss@mageia.org
+https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss
+

diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100920/4b058a00/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100920/4b058a00/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..73b23d296 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100920/4b058a00/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +I fully agree with this opinion. Linux-libre should be offered to free software addict users while propierty drives and other non-free software included as a choice.

2010/9/20 Filipe Saraiva <filip.saraiva@gmail.com>
+
It would be good to give this to the user. I agree with her.
+ +
Em 19 de setembro de 2010 17:50, André Machado <andreferreiramachado@yahoo.com.br> escreveu:
+
+
People,

Now that the distro is starting, it's easier to define the course of the project. We have to make sure we're doing the right thing.
+ +
Something to be discussed is whether the distro will follow the guidelines of the FSF and have only free software on it. This is something to be widely discussed: support for the Stallman's group could be very advantageous, but would sacrifice the end user experience. Proprietary software could be placed in a separate repository. Another point is that according GPL, all source code should be available.
+ +
But something the distro MUST have as an option to the user - that would bring a lot of free software activists for our side - regardless of the choice to be made in relation to this requirement as is the ability to install your kernel linux-libre .
+ +
Basically, linux-libre is a fork of the Linux + kernel maintained by the FSF Latin America that has no binary blobs. Currently, there are very few distros that offer it.

I believe he should be in the repositories or on the installation media, where the user can install a system with it by typing something like "install = libre" or something similar at boot time of this media. Of course, we offer regular Linux kernel as default.
+ +
For more information, see: http://www.fsfla.org/svnwiki/selibre/linux-libre/

+ + + +  
_______________________________________________
+Mageia-discuss mailing list
+Mageia-discuss@mageia.org
+https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss
+



--
Filipe Saraiva
**************************************
Meu blog: http://www.liberdadenafronteira.blogspot.com/
+ +
Associação Piauiense de Software Livre
Projeto Software Livre - Piauí - PSL-PI

“Você deve ser a mudança que deseja ver no mundo.” - Gandhi

+
_______________________________________________
+Mageia-discuss mailing list
+Mageia-discuss@mageia.org
+https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss
+

-- cgit v1.2.1