From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120613/007835.html | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120613/007835.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120613/007835.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120613/007835.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120613/007835.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f762bd909 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120613/007835.html @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + + [Mageia-discuss] Flash videos + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-discuss] Flash videos

+ andre999 + andre999mga at laposte.net +
+ Wed Jun 13 10:42:45 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
TJ a écrit :
+> On 06/12/2012 02:16 PM, TJ wrote:
+>> Adobe has announced that Flashplayer for Linux will not be supported
+>> beyond version 11.2. There will be backported security updates for a
+>> while, but that's it.
+>>
+>> I've read that Linux has two open-source alternatives, Gnash and
+>> Lightspark. Any opinions on which is best? And what about installing 
+>> both?
+>>
+>> TJ
+>>
+>>
+> Oops. Should have looked before asking that last question. I see 
+> Lightspark is a dependency for Gnash.
+>
+> But do they make a functional alternative to Adobe's offering...
+>
+> TJ
+>
+I tried Gnash a couple of years ago and wasn't impressed.  But now I 
+block flash by default (and rarely unblock) so I couldn't say.
+When I tried it before, it could be installed the same time as Flash.  
+The latest version is in core.  So why not try it and see ?
+
+As I understand it, Adobe is planning to phase out support for all flash 
+in favour of something based on HTML5, but I could be mistaken.
+
+-- 
+André
+
+
+ + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1