From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120518/007322.html | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120518/007322.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120518/007322.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120518/007322.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120518/007322.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..eca2e64a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120518/007322.html @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + + + [Mageia-discuss] page of Mageia in wikipedia (in english) has been deleted + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-discuss] page of Mageia in wikipedia (in english) has been deleted

+ Dimitrios Glentadakis + dglent at gmail.com +
+ Fri May 18 21:07:24 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
Le 18 mai 2012 20:44, "Romain d&apos;Alverny" <rdalverny at gmail.com> a
+écrit :
+>
+> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Dimitrios Glentadakis <dglent at gmail.com>
+wrote:
+> > The only reason that i can think right now is that someone from
+wikipedia hates Mageia or he is afraid from its success.
+>
+> No, it's only that 3 persons voted for deletion, and 2 against. Take
+> this as a cold machine; someone triggered it and here it is. Would
+> have been there 1 or 2 person against, it wouldn't have happened. What
+> is somewhat valid is that the Mageia article may have missed enough
+> references to news or other type sites, talking about Mageia. We just
+> need someone to start a new page with a more documented format, and I
+> think this will make it.
+
+Even in this case the delete is not a responsable action. The guy who does
+nt wanted the article could simply add a notice in the header to inform
+that "this article has few external sources, be aware of the information
+you read, there is a discussion currently about that".
+It is clear that the goal was to delete the article. And if you read with
+attention his reasons, it would be very difficult ,see impossible, to
+convince him. Just for the obvious, the existance of the 3rd in the last
+month distribution. And as i said, his fantastic creteria dont match the
+other distributions listed in wikipedia. Why he did nt deleted them ?
+-------------- next part --------------
+An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
+URL: </pipermail/mageia-discuss/attachments/20120518/4c56d463/attachment.html>
+
+ + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1