From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120208/006434.html | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120208/006434.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120208/006434.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120208/006434.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120208/006434.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a1d3934e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120208/006434.html @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ + + + + [Mageia-discuss] A possible risk ? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-discuss] A possible risk ?

+ Michael Scherer + misc at zarb.org +
+ Wed Feb 8 15:31:56 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
Le mercredi 08 février 2012 à 12:47 +0000, Claire Robinson a écrit :
+> On 08/02/12 12:35, Michael Scherer wrote:
+
+> I don't think QA is an issue regarding updates to 1. Do you really feel 
+> that way or were you meaning in a more general way?
+
+The upgrade problem was on mandriva 2010.2, why relate this to mageia
+1 ?
+
+And yes, i speak on a general note, the problem with letting people do
+updates is when updates are bad and faulty, and that's something that
+would have been caused either by lack of QA ( from distributor side ),
+or by a user doing what we said to not do, like mixing packages, etc
+( for example, using MIB backports )
+
+> Ensuring an upgrade path from Mandriva 2010.2 is really something we (QA 
+> team) would expect maintainers to maintain.
+
+Sure, can you tell where it was broken ?
+
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+
+ + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1