From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-November/008873.html | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-November/008873.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-November/008873.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-November/008873.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-November/008873.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b677044a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-November/008873.html @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ + + + + [Mageia-discuss] mageia under vmware ESXi + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-discuss] mageia under vmware ESXi

+ Thomas Backlund + tmb at mageia.org +
+ Thu Nov 1 16:10:14 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
David Walser skrev 1.11.2012 17:04:
+> Luca Olivetti wrote:
+>> Hello,
+>>
+>> TPTB have decided to upgrade our ageing server (still running mandrake) with a new system based on vmware ESXi.
+>> I thought I'd install mageia in some of the virtual machines to migrate current services, but I see that it isn't certified as a guest OS
+> under vmware ESXi.
+>> I actually don't care, but the vendor has suggested that we stick to one of the supported distributions.
+>> I don't think that it's because mageia is a community distribution, because I see that debian, fedora and opensuse are "certified" (as are
+> the commercial ones like RHEL, SLES, CentOS, etc.).
+>> Maybe nobody got in touch with vmware to have mageia listed as a "certified" distribution?
+>
+> Not sure what it matters having it "certified."  I run several Mageia server VMs in ESXi at work and they work great.
+>
+
+And usually certification means €€€ ...
+
+
+--
+Thomas
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1