From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-November/008871.html | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-November/008871.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-November/008871.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-November/008871.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-November/008871.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f6d32489c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-November/008871.html @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + + [Mageia-discuss] mageia under vmware ESXi + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-discuss] mageia under vmware ESXi

+ David Walser + luigiwalser at yahoo.com +
+ Thu Nov 1 16:04:09 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
Luca Olivetti wrote:
+> Hello,
+> 
+> TPTB have decided to upgrade our ageing server (still running mandrake) with a new system based on vmware ESXi.
+> I thought I'd install mageia in some of the virtual machines to migrate current services, but I see that it isn't certified as a guest OS 
+under vmware ESXi.
+> I actually don't care, but the vendor has suggested that we stick to one of the supported distributions.
+> I don't think that it's because mageia is a community distribution, because I see that debian, fedora and opensuse are "certified" (as are 
+the commercial ones like RHEL, SLES, CentOS, etc.).
+> Maybe nobody got in touch with vmware to have mageia listed as a "certified" distribution?
+
+Not sure what it matters having it "certified."  I run several Mageia server VMs in ESXi at work and they work great.
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1