From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-August/008446.html | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-August/008446.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-August/008446.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-August/008446.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-August/008446.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6f774ea4c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-August/008446.html @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + + [Mageia-discuss] UEFI and Secure Boot (Tony Blackwell) + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-discuss] UEFI and Secure Boot (Tony Blackwell)

+ Wolfgang Bornath + molch.b at googlemail.com +
+ Sun Aug 12 11:28:43 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
2012/8/12 Tony Blackwell <tablackwell at bigpond.com>:
+> Goh Lip wrote:
+> "Personally, as things stand as it is, I'd opt for disabling secure boot and
+> if Windows 8 won't boot (with disabled secure boot), so be it."
+>
+> My current understanding from communications with ASUS and Gigabyte is that
+> their BIOS's will not provide any way to disable secure boot.  Does anyone
+> have further info re this?
+
+If these informations are correct then both are not respecting
+Microsoft's "rules": Microsoft requirements for standard desktop
+computers bearing the Windows 8 logo say that Secure Boot can be
+disabled.
+
+Since 4 weeks a big German OEM (Medion) for the mass market offers a
+PC with UEFI, where UEFI is disabled by default. The MoBo is a
+MSI-Mainboard MS-7800. The PC comes with Windows 7 and an upgrade
+option for Windows 8.
+http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Aldi-PC-becomes-first-retail-PC-with-UEFI-Secure-Boot-1635893.html
+
+The only architecture Microsoft demands a UEFI which can't be disabled
+is the ARM architecture.
+
+Personally I must admit that I never thought that SuSE nor Fedora
+would spread Microsoft FUD. Still they do.
+Mageia should not pay any attention.
+
+ + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1