From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101210/003201.html | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101210/003201.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101210/003201.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101210/003201.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101210/003201.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..00f38532a --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101210/003201.html @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ + + + + [Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo

+ Romain d'Alverny + rdalverny at gmail.com +
+ Fri Dec 10 12:37:15 CET 2010 +

+
+ +
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 20:37, José Alberto Valle Cid
+<j.alberto.vc at gmail.com> wrote:
+> Part of this comment
+> (http://blog.mageia.org/?p=289&cpage=1#comment-442) resume very well
+> for me some of the reactions (included mine) [...]
+> "I expected to be more open than this" [...]
+>
+> The part between "" is key for me, we expect mageia don't repeat the
+> mistakes of mandriva  , may be at this time there is not a tool to
+> manage votes from community and you have to do in the way you do the
+> things with logo process.
+
+It's not even a question of tool here. The decision process was
+presented, explained ahead of it to happen, several times, here, on
+the wiki page, and no serious objection was raised about it. The way
+this decision happened, for that matter, from the founding board,
+having read, checked and reflected upon the feedback from the
+community, is legitimate. Questioning this after the game is...
+curious.
+
+We will improve and use the voting platform for further decisions, but
+there will be decisions that will be taken only from the board, or
+from the council or from all team members, depending on the
+context/decision; but not from anyone just passing by.
+
+And remember, council/board members will be elected, for that matter.
+Here, the founding board obviously takes this role for the time being,
+as it triggered Mageia and sets the basic bricks.
+
+This leads back to the team constitution process; the discussion about
+which has not been closed, several weeks ago and we will have to come
+to something clear before this voting process can be more widely used.
+
+> But i think a tread in mailing list or even a dedicated mailing list
+> for receive votes for logos was fit very well as poll tool :)
+
+That's what the open discussion here (that many participated in) was
+for. The board did not vote from nowhere without having checked others
+views.
+
+We can and will improve, but please do take into account that the
+decision process has been announced and open to debate long enough
+before we did come to vote.
+
+Cheers,
+
+Romain
+
+ + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1