From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101025/002649.html | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101025/002649.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101025/002649.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101025/002649.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101025/002649.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8b05bd741 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101025/002649.html @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ + + + + [Mageia-discuss] Suggestions + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions

+ Wolfgang Bornath + molch.b at googlemail.com +
+ Mon Oct 25 20:44:28 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
2010/10/25 Wayne Sallee <Wayne at waynesallee.com>:
+> Wolfgang Bornath wrote on 10/25/2010 12:24 PM:
+>>
+>> I don't think it would help. There is (was) the tag "Doc" (or similar)
+>> in Bugzilla which already marked the bug as something related to
+>> documentation. Somebody who is concerned and ignored that would also
+>> ignore a separate section and vice versa.
+>>  I like a more general approach involving the users and packagers
+>> likewise:
+>
+> Yea I think that having it all in the same bugzilla is best, though most
+> newbees are not going to think of posting the issue in a bug report. Most
+> newbees are going to think that bug reports are for the software not working
+> right. So I think we need to somehow let the newbees know that bugzilla is
+> the place to report improvements needed in rpm documentation.
+
+That's where the part is coming in which you cut from the quote of my mail :)
+
+-- 
+wobo
+
+ + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1