From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101012/002351.html | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101012/002351.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101012/002351.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101012/002351.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101012/002351.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b0ab1383e --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101012/002351.html @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ + + + + [Mageia-discuss] How about launching "Mageia working parties"? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-discuss] How about launching "Mageia working parties"?

+ Juergen Harms + Juergen.Harms at unige.ch +
+ Tue Oct 12 13:14:17 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
On 10/12/2010 10:54 AM, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
+> There needs to be some sort of formal designation (to know who is
+> working with whom and on what) as well as progress/final reporting and
+> archives of discussions or results. But that's something to iron out
+> of practice.
+
+Sure - I did not want to drown the suggestion in too much 
+administration-mindedenes. The minimum to require would probably be
+
+- to draft a very short summary on what the WP wants to achieve (some 
+kind of terms of reference - if you have formulated what you want to do, 
+you have prepared a solid base for the work),
+
+- to have a clearly defined figurehead (party-leader) who has the role 
+of maintaining communication with the Council,
+
+- and maybe to fix a deadline for a first feedback to the Council on 
+what is happening (to avoid having open-ended activities hanging around).
+
+As you say: iron out of practice - try one or 2 projects, learn from the 
+experience and use that as the base for defining the rules of the game.
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1