From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101005/002218.html | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101005/002218.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101005/002218.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101005/002218.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101005/002218.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..10006be67 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101005/002218.html @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ + + + + [Mageia-discuss] Mageia governance model draft + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-discuss] Mageia governance model draft

+ Tux99 + tux99-mga at uridium.org +
+ Tue Oct 5 17:48:46 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
+
+> Teams are made of at least two sub-groups (from a credentials point of view):
+>  * "Apprentices" (people being mentored into the team - someone
+> suggested "petit scarabée" as a label but...)
+>  * and "Masters".
+> 
+[...]
+
+Romain, that sound like a very rigid regimented structure that I fear 
+will cause "i'm better than you" kind of feelings, etc.
+
+I don't see the point in strictly classifying people in either masters 
+or slaves (sorry, freudian slip, i meant apprentices) because skill 
+levels are a lot more varied and fluid than just two classes.
+
+Of course there will be mentors and mentored but there is no need to 
+create a rigid two class structure with priviledges for the master 
+class.
+
+This sounds very much against the spirit of a collaborative community to 
+me.
+
+Please also read my other related post:
+http://mageia.linuxtech.net/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=66&goto=596#msg_596
+
+I hope this dual-class system is not set in stone already.
+
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1