From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100924/000944.html | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100924/000944.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100924/000944.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100924/000944.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100924/000944.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..02e1fa839 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100924/000944.html @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ + + + + [Mageia-discuss] commercial support + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-discuss] commercial support

+ herman + herman at aeronetworks.ca +
+ Fri Sep 24 08:54:21 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 23:45 -0700, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
+
+> Instead of commercialising Mageia, i would propose that a page be provided by 
+> people who are willing to provide support on Mageia to companies. (more or 
+> less like debian)
+> 
+> I am not saying a separately branded enterprise version is off the table, i'm 
+> merely stating that at the start of this project, it may instill some 
+> confidence in our project if companies could see that some kind of support will 
+> be available.
+Yes, I would also prefer this model.  There is a legal issue with it
+though.  In order for a consultant to provide support to a third party,
+the distribution artwork and other utilities must be free for use and
+distribution to third parties.  So the use of the GPL3 is not allowed
+and trademarked artwork must be explicitly given away.
+
+In short, Mageia would need a license similar to the Scientific Linux
+distribution: https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/faq/legal
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1