From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000638.html | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 143 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000638.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000638.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000638.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000638.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..742c8e717 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000638.html @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ + + + + [Mageia-discuss] Mageia Forums + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-discuss] Mageia Forums

+ Marc Paré + marc at marcpare.com +
+ Wed Sep 22 04:46:13 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
> I realise that what i described might not be the case in every FOSS
+> project or not in even in the majority, but it isn't just wishful
+> thinking, I know it is reality in some projects (even large projects).
+>
+> For example in the XBMC project (which is very large too), several
+> devs partecipate occasionally in end-user threads on the XBMC forum and
+> the interaction works very well as the devs are marked as such on the
+> forum so the interaction is normally very respectful.
+> This benefits boths sides as the devs stay in touch with what the users
+> think about new features or issues and the users benefit from an insight
+> into the thinking that lead to specific design choices.
+>
+> I think the reason this works well on the XBMC project is because the
+> devs themselves use a section of the forum to communicate among
+> themselves (rather than a ML) and therefore since they are on the forum
+> anyway, it's not a big effort for them to have a look at the active
+> end-user threads, too.
+>
+> While I'm in no position to influence this, I believe that Mageia
+> and it's community would greatly benefit if the Mageia devs would use a
+> reserved section of the Mageia forum (a subforum where only devs can
+> post) for cooker discussions rather than a mailing-list, since it would
+> bring devs and users closer to each other and facilitate interaction.
+
+If you are talking about transparency with group discussions, ideally, 
+this would be something that would happen in any group. However, I think 
+that we are also realistic in knowing that there are some occasions when 
+private group discussions are best for the sake of production.
+
+Common sense should prevail and avoiding any situation where there is a 
+smacking of elitism or group discussion behind closed doors should be 
+avoided.
+
+Optimistically, it looks like we are all here to work in a cooperative 
+environment. We just need to keep working at this and remind ourselves 
+often of our community commitments.
+
+Marc
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1